oke, first of all sorry for my bad English. I had 2 photo's they where removed by the administrator. the photo's of Bruges where very good large enough, fantastic of quality and the had together 47 point. The people who nows me from trekearth, know that I only put good stuff on the side. So I ask you why you remove them. I can not follow the rules here.

regard jaap

Dear Jaap, Give a link to the photo, I'm curious...

 

http://www.fotopedia.com/wiki/Flanders#!/items/hollandfotograaf-m5W8iXf6mgU

http://www.fotopedia.com/wiki/Flanders#!/items/hollandfotograaf-LYG...

 

This are the two photo who where remove out Bruges.

groet jaap

When I follow the link it brings me to pictures that are not taken by you and are not taken in Bruges.

http://www.fotopedia.com/items/hollandfotograaf-m5W8iXf6mgU

http://www.fotopedia.com/items/hollandfotograaf-LYGIdgEwE6I

 

I hope those links are working

One of my photos was removed from the Canal of Damme article. It shows the Schellemeulen and the Canal of Damme. I don't understand why it was removed by an admin. Can I get an explanation for this? Thank you.

I am not agree that my photo's are not sharp enough and 1391 x 1200 = 9 to low and therefore you remove this quality job.  oke the other photo is 61 below that 1400, but for this photo I can say when you want quality, you have here quality.

regard jaap

When I look to them in big format you must tel me what is wrong about it.

jaap

Jaap, 

The Quality Guideline is used very rigorously.  1399 is not 1400, 1078 is not 1080. I can understand that, you can't start an argument over every photo that's a few pixels to small. I just hope you still have your originals so you can upload them again.

Personally I find it strange that photo's cropped to a square must  therefore be bigger because they have to be 1400 by 1400,

It is very irritating that many of the best photo's on fotopedia have a resolution below the guidelines. You can view them in the article they were in originally, but when you nominate them in another article they are flagged. I just hope these great photo's will not disappear!   

oke I know what you mean, but on the other side when I look to the very bad photo's with that resolution by an article I think by myself, that bad picture they must deleted.

I am a new here because I stopped by trekearth because the moderators, I hope not that I have the same here.

regard jaap

OK, Raphie. Now I understand why my pic has been removed. I found it strange because it was posted before and accepted. But it was before you changed the minimum size for the pictures. Thanks for your answer.

Have a nice weekend,

Philippe

Fotopedia is changing its rules quite often and it happens unannounced. Since about a month you lose reputation points when you vote down on photo's, so bad pictures tend to stay on the site much longer than before. You can earn them back when these pfoto's are removed, but you can also lose more if they are voted up again. If you earn more than 100 points on a day you can vote down without consequences, until you are back to 100. So after adding a lot of photo's to articles, you're own pictures or great pictures by others, which is the best way for getting points, you are rewarded with the privilige of cleaning up.

thank you Jos for the explaining.

groet jaap