Steven Goethals
posted this on Feb 22 19:48
Hi,
Just wondering why the following picture was removed from the "Buddhism" article. This article is full with portraits of monks. So i'm wondering why a picture of a buddhist nun is voted down and removed from this article. It is a clear and sharp picture.
http://www.fotopedia.com/items/H0KVwfIxM3w-il1wM7dDILQ
Also... isn't it possible to force the people who vote down a picture to leave a comment on the reason why. The option is allready there but it isn't obligatory.
Comments
your photo seems good, even if not perfect
I agree with you: often I really don't understand negative score on some photos.
Is it possible, at least, to know if a photo is voted down for quality or relevance?
Hello Steven,
The photo has been voted down by the community, and got a negative score for more than 7 days, hence the removal from the article.
Regarding your questions, comments are currently not activated, but this is an idea.
@Alessandra : votes on quality and relevance are currently aggregated but this could be an idea for improvment yes. Please add it to the feature request topic http://help.fotopedia.com/forums/89362-feature-requests