Forums/Feature Requests

Votes: positive and negative

Nilson Menezes
posted this on September 03, 2010 19:25

I have a proposition to do about voting system.

  • Positive voting: no changes, anyone can vote anonymously as today.
  • Negative voting: it is not anonymous, and a justification is mandatory.

It is important for each one to know why your photo is negatively appreciate. I always prefer indicate as inappropriate (giving a reason) rather than make a negative voting. If I don't like the photo, but it is technical acceptable, I simply don't vote. If the photo has an infringement (quality chart, moral rules, etc.), I use the inappropriate button.

 

Comments

User photo
Sandro Franchi

100% agree, the negative voting needs to have a justification/feedback for the author/curator.

September 04, 2010 17:56
User photo
Hakki Aydin Ucar

100% agree, I recently raised this subject to moderator;

ZERO points has been assigned by someone I very wonder who he OR she is ??
Because , I could not find what the reason behind of this, Zero points mean they did not where they were supposed to be, they did not deserve any point, in past I faced lots of event like this, most of (I believe) great picture eliminated with no reason ??


IMHO, maybe ,it is better if voter must be forced to put an detail about negative points by fotopedia ,such as "why you think the photo is not suitable for the subject" ,without reasons no one should not assign negative points without an explanation.

August 11, 2011 14:57
User photo
Nilson Menezes

I have opened this subject almost one year ago, and nothing has been changed about voting rules. Others people throughout the forum have proposed new rules about voting (see http://help.fotopedia.com/entries/318004-modify-voting-system).  I would like that someone inside Fotopedia gives us a feedback about  it.

August 11, 2011 17:05
User photo
Damien Roué
Fotopedia

Hello Nilson, 

As Raphie mentioned it here, we're working on improvements in the voting system that should improve the quality and usefulness of votes, including the negative ones.

August 22, 2011 13:47
User photo
Sandro Franchi

Cool Damien, keep us posted about this!

August 22, 2011 14:08
User photo
Nilson Menezes

Thanks Damien. I just posted a comment there.

August 22, 2011 14:34
User photo
Hakki Aydin Ucar

Thank you Damien!

August 22, 2011 14:42
User photo
Mykola Swarnyk

I am supporting this case. I can imagine many motives for voting down - for example somebody have to empty some place on the server, or somebody`s feeling of style is much different, or for some technical reasons invisible for the author... But all of those thoughts are just fantasy. If I want to improve quality of my work I deserve some minimal advises. Thats all. So good you are working on it. Thanks

September 24, 2011 17:15
User photo
Dan Marsh

You can always post a link to your photo, in the photo feedback topic, to get some suggestions on why it has been voted down.

September 24, 2011 17:42